A plea was moved by St Stephen’s School on Thursday within the Delhi High Court in opposition to the Delhi College’s order to withdraw its admission prospectus and permit admissions by way of the Frequent College Entrance Check (CUET).
The transfer comes a day after a legislation scholar on the Delhi University approached the excessive court docket by way of a Public Curiosity Litigation (PIL) alleging that the faculty violates DU pointers by way of its 15 per cent weightage plan for interviews beneath a range committee.
After listening to the submissions of the petitioner, a bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula listed the petition earlier than the division bench headed by Appearing Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi.
Now the matter will likely be heard on July 6.
In the course of the course of the listening to, Further Solicitor Basic Chetan Sharma cited the PIL filed by the legislation scholar on Wednesday.
He stated, on this regard, a discover has been issued to the respondents together with the St Stephens School.
Advocate Romy Chacko appeared on behalf of the faculty.
Stating the similarities within the plea, the bench stated each issues must be handled by the identical bench.
The Delhi High Court on Wednesday had issued discover on the PIL difficult the choice of St Stephen’s School to grant 15 per cent weightage to interviews beneath a range committee for the admissions to the final class for the present educational 12 months.
“The advice of the committee was a boon for these lakhs of scholars who needed to review in Respondent College however didn’t have sufficient marks of their intermediate exams,” the plea learn. It additionally alleged that the method will give “ample room for discrimination and manipulation”.
The prospectus issued by St Stephen’s for admissions 2022-23 states that college students from all classes, together with basic/unreserved seats, will likely be admitted on the idea of an 85:15 ratio. Whereas 85 per cent of weightage could be given to the Frequent College Entrance Check (CUET), 15 per cent weightage could be given to interviews.
Nonetheless, this determination is a violation of the Delhi University pointers issued for admissions to the brand new educational session, the petitioner scholar argued.
(Solely the headline and film of this report might have been reworked by the Enterprise Normal workers; the remainder of the content material is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)