The contempt case in opposition to Steve Bannon is now within the palms of the jury after the federal government concluded its rebuttal to the protection’s closing argument.
Prosecutor Amanda Vaughan begins the rebuttal by telling the jury, “The defendant needs to make it laborious, tough, and complicated. They need you to marvel, ‘What am I lacking out on?
“You are not lacking something,” mentioned Vaughn. “There have been two witnesses as a result of it is so simple as it sounds… as clear as black and white”, she mentioned.
She mentioned Bannon had advised the committee that he wouldn’t adjust to the summons, however “this isn’t a dialog.” She mentioned that the committee repeatedly advised Bannon that he rejected his claims and needed to comply, however Bannon is now defending his actions by saying that he had raised objections on the time.
“It is like a baby arguing with their mother and father even after they have been grounded. They know they have been grounded, they will argue no matter they need; it does not change the actual fact That call has been made,” she mentioned. On this matter, she mentioned, the committee took the choice and is empowered to take action.
“It isn’t a mistake,” Vaughan mentioned of Bannon’s actions. “It is a selection, it is contempt, and it is a crime.”
It then emphasised the protection’s argument that Bannon’s non-compliance couldn’t have been “intentional” as a result of the committee didn’t pursue different choices or take the matter to courtroom, equivalent to asking the committee to “go to courtroom”. There was some kind of obligation” and “get their permission,” she mentioned.
Vaughan mentioned, “It is like saying that the referee on a soccer discipline cannot name on performs till they go to the baseball diamond subsequent door and get the opinion of the primary umpire.” “The committee doesn’t reply to former President Trump” – it’s a separate department of presidency, she mentioned.
As for Bannon’s latest “no hurt, no foul” argument that he’s now able to testify publicly as a result of Trump despatched a letter saying he would surrender govt privileges, Vaughan mentioned, ” It does not present proof on this case.”
“The sudden choice to conform is nothing however a ploy. And it is not a superb one both, as a result of the defendant forgot to inform the committee that he would provide them with the paperwork,” Vaughan mentioned. Bannon is “pretending to conform now,” she mentioned, and “it is a waste of everybody’s time.”
Vaughan mentioned, “The committee advised the defendant a number of instances that disobedience was against the law, however he did not hear as a result of he did not care. He triggered contempt for them and for the general public service they have been attempting to do.” are.”
“He’s responsible,” she concluded.
On the conclusion of closing arguments, the decide dropped an alternate jury member, leaving 12 jurors to start deliberations.